Please Support the Liberty Legal Foundation! They are Heroes!

Please support the Liberty Legal Foundation! They wrote: "Just yesterday we agreed to step in to help a Georgia citizen convince the State of Georgia that our Constitution requires Presidential candidates to have TWO U.S. citizen parents."

I have studied this issue and I believe the Liberty Legal Foundation is right.

Please support the Liberty Legal Foundation by donating to them! They are fighting ObamaCare. They are fighting the fact that Obama is not a natural-born citizen and therefore is not eligible to be president. They are fighting for you over two of today's most important legal issues.

Attorney Van Irion is a hero. He is leading the charge against everything Obama has done wrong. He is fighting ObamaCare and he is fighting Obama's eligibility. I am reposting his latest blog post below with his permission. Please read it and help out all you can.
- Bradley Hennenfent, M.D.

Too Many Battles to Fight
by Van Irion, Esq.
http://libertylegalfoundation.org/

We have been blessed by the generous donations of many of our members and this support has allowed us to do much this year.

Just yesterday we agreed to step in to help a Georgia citizen convince the State of Georgia that our Constitution requires Presidential candidates to have TWO U.S. citizen parents. This challenge would have the Georgia Secretary of State keep Obama off the Democratic primary ballot because Obama isn’t a natural-born citizen. You can see our filing in that case on our web site. [LINK] If you read the motion, you will see the stunning argument by our sitting President that a popular vote of the people overrides Constitutional limitations. You will see our response to that argument on pages 7 & 8 of our filing.

This latest state action means that LLF has active legal challenges to keep Obama off the ballot in four different states. We’ve filed in Tennessee, Arizona, New Hampshire, and Georgia. We agreed to this latest action for several reasons. First, and most importantly, the judge hearing this matter appears to be impartial. Meaning we may actually get a fair hearing. Second, Georgia has clear election codes that require their Secretary of State to strike any candidate who isn’t qualified to hold the office sought. Third, Georgia code also explicitly grants Georgia citizens standing to challenge any candidate’s qualifications to hold office. Most states don’t have such codes.

Now for the frustrating news: we turn away requests for help every day. This is why we need your support. We’ve had several requests to file challenges to Obama’s Constitutional qualifications in Texas, Alabama, North Carolina, Florida, California, New Jersey, Michigan, and Virginia. I’m sure I’m forgetting some. This month alone we’ve gotten three requests for Liberty Legal to file amicus briefs in various cases. Just today we got another request in a case challenging the Constitutional basis for zoning laws which allows for the unconstitutional infringements of Agenda 21.

We want to take on these battles. We simply don’t have the resources to fight them all.

We are doing as much as possible with your donations. In addition to the certification lawsuits mentioned above, we are filing Supreme Court amicus brief on Obamacare in our attempt to get Wickard v. Filburn overturned. We’re still pressing the Federal Court in Texas to rule on our preliminary injunction in the OCA. On the immigration front, we’re also filing a Supreme Court amicus brief in U.S. v. Arizona. We will be the only group in that case to point out that the Obama administration’s policy violates existing Federal law. We are working towards helping groups in Alabama and Texas with their Obama ballot challenges.

Liberty Legal Foundation is very grateful for all the support we’ve received. But there are so many important battles that are not being fought simply because we don’t have the resources to fight them all. We want to do more. Please give what you can to help us continue our work to restore our Constitutional Republic. Thank you.

In Liberty,
Van Irion, Esq.
Co-Founder, Lead Counsel
LIBERTY LEGAL FOUNDATION
http://libertylegalfoundation.org/
Reference:
http://www.icontact-archive.com/FEgdUq2-3KhVnIWd7rSXv-8qnYwhP55a?w=4#

My Favorite Milton Friedman Video on Economics

This video explains why we should all be against RACIST class warfare and the RACIST minimum wage. The economic lessons given are ones that could turn America around and could restore our economy. The video shows Nobel Prize winning economist Milton Friedman being interviewed by Phil Donahue. At a time when BAD socialist ObamaNomics are killing our country this is a must see video if you want our economy to recover, and if you want our jobs back from overseas.

I hope you enjoy the video.
Bradley Hennenfent, M.D., physician & economist
The link to video is here in case the embedded format does not work: Milton Friedman Video on Economics

BradMD Enjoys His First Top Tweet on Twitter against ObamaCare

President Obama lied to me 10 times about healthcare reform. He said eight times that healthcare reform would be transparent and would be on C-span. Those were the first eight lies.

He said his door was "always open" to good ideas on healthcare reform. That was a lie. I knocked on that door.

He said all good ideas had been put on the table. That was a lie - an obvious lie to those of us who were keeping track of all the good ideas.

No wonder people have turned against Obama and ObamaCare. Especially since I have never seen an apology or an ounce of regret for the lying.

Those of us against ObamaCare and for healthcare that will empower patients instead of uncaring third parties are sometimes being heard. My first “Top Tweet” on Twitter was this one: ObamaCare means government can create an Orwellian future for you. Repeal it! #hcr #TeaParty #gop #tlot #tcot #tiot #ocra #sgp #tpp #ucot. It came up when I searched the healthcare reform hashtag, which is #hcr.

Good healthcare is about being in control of your own body. It's about having the power to make life and death decisions for yourself and your family. It's about having the money to spend on the healthcare that you want, not on what some figurative "death panel" will allow you to have.

Repeal ObamaCare. Make patients, doctors, and nurses more powerful and the uncaring third parties less powerful. Do healthcare reform right.

Bradley Hennenfent, M.D.
physician & economist
Twitter:
https://twitter.com/#!/BradMD

Hero Against ObamaCare - Van Irion - Strikes Again!

Dear Patriots,
If you are not supporting Liberty Legal Foundation and Van Irion, Esq. in the fight against ObamaCare, please get on board!

It's about dignity. If you want dignity as a patient you have to have power and choice in the healthcare system. ObamaCare has taken power and choice away from patients and has given it to uncaring third parties. Your life is not worth as much to those entities. Your life, your spouse's life, and your children's lives are most important to you. You should have the maximum power and control over saving your own life and your loved one's lives!

Help us Repeal ObamaCare and empower patients instead! Help us to restore dignity and honor to the patient. Help us to empower patients, doctors, nurses, and all allied healthcare professionals to be on the same team working for you again.

Attorney Van Irion has filed another SIGNIFICANT motion against ObamaCare today. His essay about this is posted below in its entirety with his permission. Please read up on this ObamaCare Class Action lawsuit and support this cause. Defeat ObamaCare!

Thank you,
Bradley Hennenfent, M.D.
physician & economist (BradMD)

Important New Filings in the ObamaCare Class Action Lawsuit (OCA)
by Van Irion, Esq.

Fellow Constitutionalists,

Today Liberty Legal Foundation filed a motion for summary judgment asking the Federal District Court in Lubbock Texas to rule Obamacare, in its entirety, unconstitutional. We wanted to let you know right away, hence the mid-week update. You can read our motion on Liberty Legal’s web page - OCA Case Status.

We filed this motion now because over the past several weeks several rulings from other Federal courts, including the Supreme Court, emphasized that our argument is correct. Liberty Legal Foundation has been arguing from the beginning that ALL of Obamacare is beyond the scope of authority of Congress. We never limited our arguments to the individual mandate. Instead we’ve been arguing all along that the FDR-packed Supreme Court of 1942 destroyed the Constitution in its Wickard v. Filburn ruling.

Now, a year and a half after Obamacare was signed into law, Federal Courts are starting to say the same thing! I urge you to at least read the quotes from the 6th Circuit on pages 10 and 11 of our motion.

A couple of weeks ago I told you about the 11th Circuit and 6th Circuit decisions, one upholding the individual mandate and the other ruling it unconstitutional. Both courts had split decisions from their 3-judge panels. One was 2 to 1 upholding the individual mandate, the other was 2 to 1 finding it unconstitutional. What was amazing about the opinions written by these 6 Federal judges was that as much as they disagree, they all agree on the underlying problem. We have two courts, six judges, five separately written opinions, two opposing rulings, and a tie on whether the individual mandate is constitutional: three judges for, three against. Yet they all agree on one thing: Wickard made a mess of commerce clause precedent.

Now, with all that laid out, isn’t the solution obvious?! OVERTURN WICKARD!!

Fortunately this is exactly what several of the judges suggested. Even the judges that ruled the individual mandate constitutional noted that their ruling was because Wickard left no appreciable limit on Congressional authority.

So, with all this recent ammunition from sitting Federal judges, we decided it was time to go on the offensive. Rather than wait for our Federal court to cite Wickard, dismiss our case, and send us up the appeal ladder, we filed our own motion for summary judgment, citing all the great language from the other courts.

Understand that because we are asking the court to overturn Supreme Court precedent typical procedure would be to expect the lower court to dismiss our case, allowing us to appeal to the Circuit Court, then to the Supreme Court. Traditionally lower courts refuse to overturn precedent from higher courts, even when the lower court is completely convinced that the precedent is wrong. However, in my opinion tradition is less important than upholding the Constitution. The Constitution protects fundamental rights from government intrusion. Fundamental rights, granted to us by God, are more important than the traditions of men in black robes.

So, we asked the court to violate tradition and ignore Wickard, in favor of the clear meaning of the Constitution.

Of course we understand that judges are unlikely to throw aside tradition, so we also made an alternative request of the court. We asked the court that if it denies our motion for summary judgment, it also make that ruling immediately appealable with a statement about its opinion of Wickard. This way, if our judge agrees with us, as we hope he will, but he still wants to honor tradition over the Constitution, he can tell the higher courts what he thinks of Wickard and pass our case up the ladder with his statement attached.

Please understand just how unusual this motion is. Asking the Court to set aside this particular tradition amounts to legal heresy. I really can’t overstate just how much lower courts honor even the most ridiculous precedent from higher courts. However, this so-called doctrine really is just a tradition. Nothing in the Constitution, in any statute, or in any rule of procedure that I’m aware of requires it. Yet asking a court to ignore it is akin to screaming obscenities in church. It is simply not done.

However, our Founding Fathers stood up to the power of a King to establish our Constitutional Republic. Hundreds of thousands of men have died horrible deaths on the battlefield to defend our Constitutional Republic. Our Constitution protects the freedom that God gave to all of us, the freedom that made America great. With that perspective in mind, I can’t stand by and allow a mere legal tradition to delay our battle to restore our Constitutional Republic. I don’t think it’s asking too much of a Federal judge to stand up for the Constitution, even if it means violating a sacrosanct tradition and defying the higher courts in this one instance. A little rebellion is a good thing. Especially if it prevents a bloody revolution.

In Liberty,

Van Irion, Esq.
Co-Founder, Lead Counsel
LIBERTY LEGAL FOUNDATION
http://www.libertylegalfoundation.net/

"Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same." - Ronald Reagan